“As far as expecting privacy, I think your privacy flew out the window as soon as you sent it to somebody else,” she continued. The exhortation part was a side business the defendant ran, where he offered to get photos removed for a $300 or so fee.Īsked whether she thinks her website is constitutionally protected, Alexander replied: “Yes, of course. On Tuesday, California’s attorney general charged a 27-year-old with identity theft and extortion for allegedly running a revenge porn website. In her website's About section, Alexander emphasizes that the posts and comments "represent the opinions of the original poster and are not endorsed, approved or representations of the opinions" of the website or its owners.īut as revenge porn sites like this have proliferated, California and New Jersey passed specific laws criminalizing revenge porn, and several other legislatures, including in Alexander’s home state of Maryland, are considering the idea. Under the Communications Decency Act of 1996, providers of an “interactive computer service” are in no way liable for what their users do, and piles of rulings since then have fortified the immunity of website owners. Nothing Alexander is doing clearly breaks any laws. Somebody’s telling a story.”Īlexander also runs a private blog called “I’m in Love with a Serial Cheater,” where she details her husband’s philandering. “If she’s 30, 40 or 50, you know better at that age.”Īsked how she ensures her names-and-shames are true and accurate, Alexander replied: “I can’t be certain for anything I read on the Internet if it’s true or not. “She’s 22, she’s 23, I’m probably not going to put her naked photos online,” Alexander explains. It’s hard concentrating on two things at once, especially when one involves your clitoris. She’ll censor the details of women’s private parts and says she won’t post naked images of a woman below a certain age. Listed below are 7 places to look for porn that's a little more interesting. They’re heavy on descriptors like "skank b****" and "unstable, delusional, psychotic, home wrecking whore!!!" (The adulterous husbands receive far less attention.)Īlexander is guided by a certain ethics. For the women, this is a space to vent, and an opportunity to shame the people they blame for destroying their lives. A lot of the photos are simple headshots – nothing explicit. The images are posted with commentary from the wives, often long, heart-wrenching tales of betrayal while pregnant, or by their friends or children's elementary school teachers. “God forbid this got into someone else’s hands, which could end up getting into my hands.” “One last night, I just had to look and say, ‘Why would any woman, I don’t care if you’re married for 50 years, why would you send this to your husband?’” she said. Alexander says women have sent her more than 1,000 images, usually taken from their husbands’ cell phones.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |